<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/6.11.7-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Torsten Schuessler - Latest Comments on Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2a ?</title>
		<link>https://www.insidesql.org/blogs/tosc/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.insidesql.org/blogs/tosc/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=71" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-EU</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=6.11.7-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>tosc in response to: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2a ?</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><a href="http://de.linkedin.com/in/dbatosc" title="Show the user profile" class="login user nowrap" rel="bubbletip_user_4"><span class="identity_link_username">tosc</span></a></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c718@https://www.insidesql.org/blogs/</guid>
			<description>Hi Scott,

i agree with you, that we just have to wait and see.

CU
tosc</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Scott,

i agree with you, that we just have to wait and see.

CU
tosc]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://www.insidesql.org/blogs/tosc/2007/03/07/microsoft_sql_server_2005_service_pack_2#c718</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Scott whigham in response to: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2a ?</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_717">Scott whigham</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c717@https://www.insidesql.org/blogs/</guid>
			<description>If you look at SERVERPROPERTY(&#039;ProductLevel&#039;), you still see SP2 but the version number has been revved. This revving of the build number is consistent with many hotfixes that we&#039;ve seen (but not all) with SQL Server. I think it&#039;s an embarrassment to MSFT (or it should be) but whether or not they&#039;ll add this hotfix into SP2a or not, we just have to wait and see. </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you look at SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel'), you still see SP2 but the version number has been revved. This revving of the build number is consistent with many hotfixes that we've seen (but not all) with SQL Server. I think it's an embarrassment to MSFT (or it should be) but whether or not they'll add this hotfix into SP2a or not, we just have to wait and see. ]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://www.insidesql.org/blogs/tosc/2007/03/07/microsoft_sql_server_2005_service_pack_2#c717</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
